No Basis For Comparing Kanu, Igboho — Presidency

The Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Public Communication and Orientation, Sunday Dare, has dismissed suggestions in some quarters that there is no distinction between the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, and Yoruba nation campaigner, Chief Sunday Adeyemo, popularly known as Sunday Igboho.

In a statement issued to journalists on Tuesday, Dare insisted that there is “no basis for comparison” between the two figures, stressing that their actions, methods and consequences are fundamentally different.

Dare argued that Kanu, who was recently convicted on terrorism charges by a Federal High Court in Abuja and is serving a life sentence, engaged in insurrection and armed confrontation against the Nigerian state.

According to him, the activities of IPOB under Kanu’s leadership resulted in significant loss of lives and economic disruption in the South-East.

Dare stated, “Nnamdi Kanu’s IPOB movement involved elements widely associated with insurrection and direct confrontation against the Nigerian state.

“This included enforcement of ‘sit-at-home’ orders (often through threats and violence), resulting in numerous deaths (reports cite over 700 fatalities linked to enforcement clashes and defiance killings).

“Other inimical activities include attacks on security forces, destruction of public infrastructure, and the formation of armed groups like ESN.

“Kanu’s rhetoric and actions escalated to calls that many viewed as inciting violence against the state and even against his own people in the South East who defied orders.”

In contrast, Dare said Sunday Igboho’s activities were largely defensive and community-focused.

“Igboho’s activism centered on defending Yoruba communities, primarily against alleged killings, kidnappings, and farm destructions by suspected herders. He focused on self-defense, warding off criminal elements from Yoruba land,” the statement read.

Discover more
Access Closa
Tongeji
Sports
Premiership
He added that Igboho pursued self-determination advocacy without creating an armed militia to confront the Nigerian military or ordering attacks on security personnel.

“Igboho also deployed peaceful agitation for Yoruba self-determination/Oduduwa Nation without establishing a militia to fight the Nigerian military, without ordering attacks on police/soldiers, and without imposing paralysing enforcement measures like sit-at-home orders that harmed civilians or the economy in his region,” Dare said.

Drawing a distinction between both men, the presidential aide said the comparison was misplaced.

“The line is clear: one crossed into armed rebellion and violent enforcement that affected (and sometimes harmed) his own ethnic group, while the other remained largely defensive and localised against perceived external threats, without the same level of state-targeted insurgency.

“Public discourse should stop equating the two; the contexts, methods, and consequences are fundamentally different,” he said.